About ACRONYM.About ACRONYM.
ACRONYM was born out of the ashes of something completely different.
We'd been talking to customers — a lot of them — and every conversation felt promising. Every founder knows that feeling: you hear what you want to hear and walk away convinced. But conviction built on happy ears isn't signal.
So we built a tool to keep us honest — one that surfaced where there was genuine signal versus the polite interest that was never really validation. When we actually listened, the answer was obvious. The product people wanted wasn't what we were building. It was the tool we had initially built for ourselves.
That realization pointed at something bigger. Every company has the same problem. Your prospects are telling you what they need and trying to determine whether you can solve it. Your customers are telling you what's working, what's broken, what they'll pay for next. That signal exists in every call, every email, every customer interaction your team has. It can sharpen your strategy, your messaging, your positioning. It can tell you what to build, what's landing, where you're losing deals you should be winning.
But it's scattered across tools, filtered through memory, or fed into AI that returns summaries nobody trusts.
The voice of the customer is everywhere. And nowhere useful at the same time.
Fixing it sounds straightforward. The AI hype cycle will tell you to build it yourself: connect your tools, write a mega-prompt, wrap an agent around it. And technically anyone can throw transcripts at AI and get decent summaries back. But scratch under the surface and you realize AI is confidently wrong most of the time. Not because the models are bad. Because AI wasn't designed to solve the context problem, it inherits it. Without accurate context you get textbook advice that could apply to any business but doesn't help you run your specific motion. AI is only as good as the context it's given. And most of that context is missing.
Building that context layer means cleaning the data, extracting real signal, connecting it to outcomes, and making it trustworthy enough to act on. That's the hard part. That's ACRONYM. And the intelligence has to reach people at the moment they need it: before the call, when a deal stalls, before the pipeline review. Not buried in a dashboard they check once a week.
Here's the part nobody says out loud: even the best context layer can't capture everything that matters. The text after the call. The hallway conversation that changed the relationship. The shift in body language that made a yes feel like a maybe. The context layer will always be incomplete. Which means the human will always need to be in the loop, to supply the judgment that no system can replicate.
We believe AI should do what AI does best. So humans can do what only humans can.
We built ACRONYM to give AI the evidence-backed context it needs — so it can empower the humans who steer it.
Ben & Sheryl
About ACRONYM.About ACRONYM.
ACRONYM was born out of the ashes of something completely different.
We'd been talking to customers — a lot of them — and every conversation felt promising. Every founder knows that feeling: you hear what you want to hear and walk away convinced. But conviction built on happy ears isn't signal.
So we built a tool to keep us honest — one that surfaced where there was genuine signal versus the polite interest that was never really validation. When we actually listened, the answer was obvious. The product people wanted wasn't what we were building. It was the tool we had initially built for ourselves.
That realization pointed at something bigger. Every company has the same problem. Your prospects are telling you what they need and trying to determine whether you can solve it. Your customers are telling you what's working, what's broken, what they'll pay for next. That signal exists in every call, every email, every customer interaction your team has. It can sharpen your strategy, your messaging, your positioning. It can tell you what to build, what's landing, where you're losing deals you should be winning.
But it's scattered across tools, filtered through memory, or fed into AI that returns summaries nobody trusts.
The voice of the customer is everywhere. And nowhere useful at the same time.
Fixing it sounds straightforward. The AI hype cycle will tell you to build it yourself: connect your tools, write a mega-prompt, wrap an agent around it. And technically anyone can throw transcripts at AI and get decent summaries back. But scratch under the surface and you realize AI is confidently wrong most of the time. Not because the models are bad. Because AI wasn't designed to solve the context problem, it inherits it. Without accurate context you get textbook advice that could apply to any business but doesn't help you run your specific motion. AI is only as good as the context it's given. And most of that context is missing.
Building that context layer means cleaning the data, extracting real signal, connecting it to outcomes, and making it trustworthy enough to act on. That's the hard part. That's ACRONYM. And the intelligence has to reach people at the moment they need it: before the call, when a deal stalls, before the pipeline review. Not buried in a dashboard they check once a week.
Here's the part nobody says out loud: even the best context layer can't capture everything that matters. The text after the call. The hallway conversation that changed the relationship. The shift in body language that made a yes feel like a maybe. The context layer will always be incomplete. Which means the human will always need to be in the loop, to supply the judgment that no system can replicate.
We believe AI should do what AI does best. So humans can do what only humans can.
We built ACRONYM to give AI the evidence-backed context it needs — so it can empower the humans who steer it.
Ben & Sheryl
About ACRONYM.About ACRONYM.
ACRONYM was born out of the ashes of something completely different.
We'd been talking to customers — a lot of them — and every conversation felt promising. Every founder knows that feeling: you hear what you want to hear and walk away convinced. But conviction built on happy ears isn't signal.
So we built a tool to keep us honest — one that surfaced where there was genuine signal versus the polite interest that was never really validation. When we actually listened, the answer was obvious. The product people wanted wasn't what we were building. It was the tool we had initially built for ourselves.
That realization pointed at something bigger. Every company has the same problem. Your prospects are telling you what they need and trying to determine whether you can solve it. Your customers are telling you what's working, what's broken, what they'll pay for next. That signal exists in every call, every email, every customer interaction your team has. It can sharpen your strategy, your messaging, your positioning. It can tell you what to build, what's landing, where you're losing deals you should be winning.
But it's scattered across tools, filtered through memory, or fed into AI that returns summaries nobody trusts.
The voice of the customer is everywhere. And nowhere useful at the same time.
Fixing it sounds straightforward. The AI hype cycle will tell you to build it yourself: connect your tools, write a mega-prompt, wrap an agent around it. And technically anyone can throw transcripts at AI and get decent summaries back. But scratch under the surface and you realize AI is confidently wrong most of the time. Not because the models are bad. Because AI wasn't designed to solve the context problem, it inherits it. Without accurate context you get textbook advice that could apply to any business but doesn't help you run your specific motion. AI is only as good as the context it's given. And most of that context is missing.
Building that context layer means cleaning the data, extracting real signal, connecting it to outcomes, and making it trustworthy enough to act on. That's the hard part. That's ACRONYM. And the intelligence has to reach people at the moment they need it: before the call, when a deal stalls, before the pipeline review. Not buried in a dashboard they check once a week.
Here's the part nobody says out loud: even the best context layer can't capture everything that matters. The text after the call. The hallway conversation that changed the relationship. The shift in body language that made a yes feel like a maybe. The context layer will always be incomplete. Which means the human will always need to be in the loop, to supply the judgment that no system can replicate.
We believe AI should do what AI does best. So humans can do what only humans can.
We built ACRONYM to give AI the evidence-backed context it needs — so it can empower the humans who steer it.
Ben & Sheryl
MEET THE TEAM
We're builders that obsess over solving hard problemsWe're builders that obsessover solving hard problems

Ben Biran
Cofounder

Sheryl Soo
Cofounder

Brian Wendt
Founding Engineer

Robert Lewis
Founding Engineer
MEET THE TEAM
We're builders that obsess over solving hard problemsWe're builders that obsessover solving hard problems

Ben Biran
Cofounder

Sheryl Soo
Cofounder

Brian Wendt
Founding Engineer

Robert Lewis
Founding Engineer
MEET THE TEAM
We're builders that obsess over solving hard problemsWe're builders that obsessover solving hard problems

Ben Biran
Cofounder

Sheryl Soo
Cofounder

Brian Wendt
Founding Engineer

Robert Lewis
Founding Engineer